A comparison of organic and conventional farming

The Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST) in the USA, assembled in 1980 a high-powered Task Force composed of 24 scientists (chaired by S.R. Aldrich) with expertise in agricultural economics, agronomy, animal science, dairy science, entomology, food science, horticulture, soil science, veterinary medicine and others to look into the similarities and differences between organic and conventional farming. The Task Force report, which remains very relevant to the current debate surrounding organic and conventional agriculture, was officially published as CAST Report No. 84 "Organic and Conventional Farming Compared" in October 1980.

Some of the interesting highlights of the report are:

1. Conventional and organic farming have much in common. They differ principally in the use of modern chemical technology. Conventional farmers use commercial inputs (fertilizers, pesticides, animal feed additives) to increase productivity while organic farmers prefer to use natural resources.

2.Both conventional and organic farmers use various mechanical, biological and other means to control pests. Conventional farmers use synthetic pesticides but organic farmers prefer to avoid them.

3. Conventional farmers extensively use nutritional supplements in animal feeds, hormonally active substances, and drugs. These substances are generally unacceptable to organic farmers.

4. The terms "natural" and "organic" are often used interchangeably in organic farming. But in science, organic refers to carbon compounds. Many such compounds occur in nature and many are synthesized in laboratories and factories. Likewise, many inorganic or noninorganic compounds occur naturally. Hence, natural compounds are not necessarily organic, and organic compounds are not necessarily natural.

5. Urea is a natural organic waste product of human and animal metabolism. It is present in animal and human excreta and is therefore accepted as a natural and nonartificial nitrogen source in organic farming. However, the urea that is synthesized in factories which is chemically identical to the urea produced by human and animal metabolism (used as fertilizer in conventional farming), is not acceptable in organic farming. This is one of the inconsistencies of organic agriculture.

6. The urea produced by animals (present in excreta) or by factories (in commercial fertilizers) is transformed in the soil into ammonium and nitrate ions, the important forms of nitrogen taken up by plants. Both ions are inorganic, not organic. Therefore, in scientific terminology, the organically grown food produced with urea derived from animals is actually "inorganically grown."

7. The "organic foods" produced by organic farming are composed of chemicals. Most foods contain many chemicals, and most of these are organic chemicals, whether the foods are produced by conventional farming or organic farming.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tropical soils: some important aspects of these less understood soils

Image
Tropical regions occur between the Tropic of Cancer and the Tropic of Capricorn. The tropics include approximately 40% of the land surface and is the largest ecozone of the earth. According to Köppen (1931), the tropics are characterized by an annual mean air temperature above 18°C through­out the whole year. The largest climatic variation is introduced by the variability of precipita­tion, reaching from nearly 0 mm in the Saharan and Atacama Desert to 11,700 mm on Mt. Waialeala in Hawaii (Eswaran et al., 1992). An Afisol (Luvisol) soil derived from mudstone in Eastern Samar, Philippines According to Uehara and Gillman  (1981), "t ropical soils" is a common name used to identify any soil that occurs in the tropics. They noted that like most common names, the term lacks precision, but it is more readily understood by a larger audience than are the scientific names. In contrast, Sanchez (1976) argued against the use of the term "tropical soils" since it does not accur
Read more

The causes of the Guinsaugon landslide

Image
On 17 February 2006, a catastrophic landslide buried the village of Guinsaugon, the second largest village of St. Bernard town (Southern Leyte, Philippines) killing more than a thousand residents and displacing approximately 19,000 people. The landslide originated on an approximately 800 m high escarpment produced by the Philippine Fault that bisects Leyte and the major islands of the Philippines. In a recent article which synthesized the papers presented during an international conference in Leyte 2008 and published in the international journal Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, Guthrie and co-workers (2009) arrived at the following conclusions: "The approximately 15 million m3 landslide was a result of progressive failures and tectonic weakening in a region made especially vulnerable by the inter-reaction of geological/tectonic, climatic and cultural factors. In southern Leyte, geology and tectonics (including historical seismicity, the progressive disintegr
Read more